Synopsis

TheBigBang!It’sthephenomenonknownforbeingresponsiblefortheUniverse’sbirth....Readmore

TheBigBang!It’sthephenomenonknownforbeingresponsiblefortheUniverse’sbirth.Exceptforthosewhowerereligiousfanatics,mostpeoplehadalreadycometo at leastpartiallyacceptthistheory.As yearspassed,moreproofthattheBigBangwasthephenomenonthatgavebirthto theUniversecontinuedto appear.At somepoint,religionsceasedto existas theclaimsof sciencesimplycouldn’tbe refutedanymore.Humanityhadfinallyacceptedas a wholethatin thisUniverse,sucha thingas godsdidn’texist…or didthey?However,humanitywouldsoonfindoutthattheBigBangwasjustpart one.ThatinfinitesimallysmallpointwheretheBigBangoriginated…wasstillthere!TheSecondBigBang,whichhada purposeunlikethefirstone,wasaboutto begin.Collapse

NotHarem,Evolution,Cultivation

Whydropped??

boiwhatthehellboi.IcheckedthisoutbecauseIreadthisbookinwebnovelandthoughtaboutwritingasuggestionhere,andIfindpeoplearguingabouttheBigBang.Onanothernote,Ineedtostartlovingmyself.

Iwaswonderingthesamething

Reallygoodimo,theMCistolerable,thepowersystemiswelldoneandtheexpositionisn'tboringatall.However,thestoryisonhiatusbctheauthorhas2otherbooks,sodon'tstartifyoudon'tseeanychapterspast664.5/5

someonereadit?worthit?whatisitabout?thedescriptiondoesn'ttellmeanything

TLDR:Sci-fitypetechuniversewithacultivation-esquepowersystem.Inthisbook,anewformofenergyisaddedintotheuniversebybeingsoutsideofittoseeifsomeonecan"breakthelimits"andescapetheuniverse(how?idk)TheMCjustwantstorunastoreinhissmalltown,butgetsbestowedwithamazingaptitudeforthisuniverse'sformofcultivationbyaenergylifeformtypecreaturethatwassentinbytheonesoutsidetheuniversebcit'sbeen1kyearssincetheyintroduceditandnoone'sdoneit.

Doesiteversaywhyhejustwantstorunastore?Ireachedchapter23sofaranditjustfeelslikehe'sunmotivatedtodoanythingandissecretlysufferingfromdepressionorsomething.Sofar,theplotfeelsforcedonlytoleadintobadjokes.

Airedidn'thavemanyambitions.UntilAirefoundoutthathehadtheminimalaptitudetobecomeaStellarRiser,healwaysthoughtthathewouldinherithismother'sshop.Itwasn'tanythingbig,letalonesomethingthatcouldmakehimrich.Hishometowndidn'thavemorethantwentythousandinhabitants,sothebusinesswasbasicallyalittlebetterthanbeinganemployeeforsomeothercompany.It'snotrelevantexceptforgivingmorecontextaboutwhytheMCissounmotivated.Althoughyeah,Ithinkheisabitdepressed.

Yourintroductionreeksofbanality.TheBigBangisn'tscience.Scienceiswhatcanbetestedand/orobserved.Howcanyoutestandobserveapurportedmesonsizedsingularitythathadhundredsofuniversalmassesthatselfcreatedfromnowherewithoutbeingcrushedbyitsuniversalsizedgravitywell?Evenfurtheritispurportedthatthesingularityexpanded32trilliontimesfasterthanlight14.5billionyearsago.Howcanyoucallthatscience?Whathaveyouobserved(scientifically)thatmovedfasterthanlight32trilliontimes?TheBigBangpurportsmatterselfcreatedfromnowherefornoreason.Provescientificallywhyanothersingularityhasn'tappearedinallthistimeseeingashowthefirstinstantiationofthepurportedmesonsizedsingularityselfcreatedfornoreasonatall.Lastly,theoreticalscienceisn'tscience.MBranetheoryistheoreticalscience.Stringtheoryistheoreticalscience.Bytheway,selfcreatinglifeisatheoryforwecannottestitorobserveit.Evolutionisalsotheoreticalsciencebecausewecannottestitorobserveit.Andno,hothotbackgroundradiationisn'tproofofthebigbanganymorethangrowthobservedinlifeinourdayisproofofevolution.

Bro,it'sjustasummarydogsecondhe'snotreadingyourcommentthesiteheusestoposthisbookiswebnovel.

Ohthatsucks.jpg

Woah!!BigBrain

It'sthenovelworldnotourEarththatissayingtheBigBangIsthecauseforthecreationoftheuniverse

Howisevolutionnotasciencewhenwecanwatchithappenourselves?Bacteriaevolves.There'sanE.Colilongtermevolutionexperimentthat'sveryfamouswithinthescientificcommunity.YoucanfindmoreaboutitonYouTube.Alongwiththat,therearesmallergroupsthatalsostudybacterialevolutionbyconstantlyhavingthebacteriafightformorespace,supremacyandpower,sothatstrongonesremainandpassontheirgenes.Thatisevolution.

You'renotwatchingevolution.Evolutionissaidtobeaprocessthatmadewaterlifebecomeallalivetoday,unlessofcourseyoucanshowbacteriabecomingallalivetoday.Youmakeastatementandpurportbeliefs.Thesebeliefsneedstobeobservedscientificallyelse,they'reforevertheoretical.Toprovewhatyou'reobservinginbacteriaisinactualityevolution,compareittothefirstandeveryinstantaneousmechanismsofEvolutionfromabillionyearsago.

I...

myguy.....birthoflifeonplanetearthandevolutionofspeciesonitisliketheeggandachicksgrowthtomaturity.beginningdosignifytheendbutthejourney/processimoreimportant

ScientificAsIthappenedData,testandobservations.OtherwiseitremainsTheoretical.

Whatyourtakingaboutistheadaptationthatbacteriagotrutokeeplivingitsaprocessofadaptationbutintheend,theyarestillthesameorganism,thatisnotevolution.evolutioniswhenthebacteriatransformintosomethingthatcanbecategorizedasatotallyneworganismoranewlifeformentirely.

Itispurportedsinglecelledbecameallalivetoday.Provideasithappenedscientificdata(observationsandtest)ofsinglecelledseaanimalbecomingallalivetoday.

I'mnotsurehowlong,butitdoessaythatsomeyearspassedtho

WellIwouldliketoaddthatsofarwehaven'tfoundaparticlethatcanexceedthespeedoflight.Thisdoesn'tmeanthatlightspeedisthefastestinthewholeofexistence.Itistheknownfastest.MoreovertheBigBangtheoremdoesn'ttalkabouttheoriginsoftheuniverseand"existence".Itisabouttheeventthatresultedinthecreationofspacewithmatterinside.Thelawsofnatureandsimilarconceptsaren'tmentionedinthistheorem.

Itispurportedthatthebigbangexpanded32trilliontimesgreaterthanlightorjustincidentallyfastenoughtoavoidbecomingablackhole;funnyhowthatworks.

Exactly,whichiswhatmakesitretardedtouseitasapointofchallengetotheideaofacreator

Andforahypotheticalscience,ithassomecredibility.TheBigBang,thatis."TwomajorscientificdiscoveriesprovidestrongsupportfortheBigBangtheory:•Hubble’sdiscoveryinthe1920sofarelationshipbetweenagalaxy’sdistancefromEarthanditsspeed;and•thediscoveryinthe1960sofcosmicmicrowavebackgroundradiation."Also,itwasEdwinHubblethatdiscoveredtheUniversewasexpanding.It'sgenerallyacceptedthatthisisthetruth,andtheexpansionwould'vehadtostartatafocalpoint,muchliketheshockwavesfromabomb,radiatingoutfromthepointoforigin.Thebigbangtheoryhassomeplausibleexplanationsandevidence,unlikewhatyoudescribeas"hypotheticalscience."Yes,inaway,itishypotheticalbutit'soneofthebestanswerswehavebasedoncommonunderstanding.Furthermore,thisisanovel.You'rereallycomplainingabout"banality"(whichIdon'twhyyouused,sinceitmeans"thefactorconditionofbeingbanal;unoriginality."Unlessofcourseyou'recallingastoryunoriginalforincludingabasiccomprehensionoftheworldbasedonmodernhumanunderstandingofscience??)whichmakesnosense.Ifyou'regoingcriticiseanovel,don'tactlikeyouknowitall.Please.

Thereisnothingplausibleaboutaselfcreatingmesonsizedseveraluniversalmassessingularityselfcreatingfromnowherethatexpands32trilliontimesfasterthanlight.Doprovidetheasithappenedobservabletestablescientificdata,thanks.

Myguy,tellmehownothingmadesomething.Bydefinition,nothingistheabsenceofeverythingsowheredidsaidthingscomefrom?

Theintroductionreeksofbanality?ThisisaFICTION.Andthethingsinfictioncannotbeexplainedbyscience.Theauthorjustputwhatevershithecouldthink.Don'tmindthesesthingssomuch,oryouwouldjustkeepgettingconfused.¯(ツ)/¯

Onlyaninsanepersonwouldinsistonnothingnessspontaneouslymakingsomething.WorseishowtheauthorassertedthatthefirstBigBangwaspurposelesslol