369 The Debate (Rebuttal Segnt)
The Rebuttal round started with heavier applause, with palpable excitent radiating from the crowd. There were even so enthusiastic whooping as the debaters ascended the stage. The celebration was not unlike the ti when two combatants with years of rivalry squared off against each other for a main-event match. Guy let out a satisfied smile as he observed the reactions from the crowd. He wasn't surprised, though, as he expected things to turn out like this from the start.
A debate is only as interesting as how invested the participants are in the topic they are supporting. People need to care about what they are arguing in favour of. If that emotion is evident, it then perates into the crowd and makes them invested in the debate as well. Each of the seven debaters on stage is committed to a stance. They believe it from the bottom of their hearts and are willing to fight in its favour (as evidenced by the fistfight they got into). Guy also took a few creative liberties with the debate format which he carried over from his past life. The standard format wasn't so sensational, opting for a more reserved and thodical process. For instance, during cross-examination, there isn't usually a dialogue between the examiner and examinee - the question and answer are fairly detached. But Guy figured that having so confrontation during the cross-examination period would sensationalise it a bit more, thus making it a bit more engaging for the audience. This was especially important in the Constructive segnts since they are fairly less confrontational - it is about building up the argunt.
The Rebuttal segnt is all about defence. Each team would try to break apart the opposing argunt while propping up their own. Guy looked to his left and gestured for Norris to step forward.
"The first debater stepping up is the team defending Definition 2, Norris."
Norris approached the podium with uncertain steps. As he watched her co closer, Guy realised why her team had placed her at the tail end of the debate segnt. The girl was practically crumbling under stage fright. If she was to be confronted during cross-examination, Guy was certain that she would fall apart altogether. Her gaze was lowered, and the piece of paper in her hand was nearly crumpled into a ball with stress. She grabbed the podium with both her hands, let out a long breath while closing her eyes, and started speaking.
"While we acknowledge the affirmative's drive for standardization, we contend that Definition 1's tunnel vision and rigidity conflict with the nature of magic itself in the process. Indeed, standardization is valuable, but it must be achieved without sacrificing the core essence and versatility of magic. Definition 1 essentially places an asterisk against the very definition it proposes, suggesting that as long as all the dominoes fall into place – a specific spell is cast, a controlled scenario is established – only then can we truly asure mana. Magic is irregular, and mana is defined by the True World Sect to be the 'cheat code' that averts the natural laws. If we try to curtail magic in all its forms through the sa lens of natural phenona, we will be sacrificing the primary nature of magic itself. Sure, it is necessary to regular a procedure so that it is repeatable and can provide comparable results no matter who performs it, but Definition 1 is far too strict in its limitations to be viable universally."
Norris' voice wasn't so loud as the others before her, as she was naturally a timid individual. However, the conviction in her words was far greater than all those before her, which roused the crowd that had returned fresh after the break and brought them right back into the heated debate.
Guy returned to the podium and urged the girl, who had reverted into a timid hunch, back to her team.
"An amazing first rebuttal by Norris, let us have a round of applause!" Guy initiated with so enthusiastic clapping. He wanted to encourage the girl to be confident in herself. Public speaking is tough for everyone. But having an especially bad experience can dissuade them from ever trying again. Guy wanted Norris' first attempt to be morable and positive.
"Our next speaker is from the team defending Definition 1, Lacey."
Lacey approached the stadium amidst light applause. It was evident that she, just like her sister, was more famous amongst the Sect mbers. Especially because she was one of the creators of a ga played by everyone on campus. Guy was sure that there would be so bias in the play caused by the girls' fa when it finally ca ti for the audience to vote for the victor of the debate. 'We'll address that if need be.'
Guy didn't want to doctor the results... but he also didn't want the outco of this pilot program to set a precedent for other debates down the line. To him, so unethical manipulation against bias, and in favour of fairness was forgivable.
"In response to the negative, we assert that Definition 1 isn't about reductionism but about establishing a common language for the asurent of mana. By asuring energy through a specific transformation, we provide a consistent yardstick for comparisons. This is not evident in Definition 2. While we agree that magic and mana are fluid and variable, it is antithetical to hinge a concept that needs to be used by a myriad of people across different backgrounds and abilities on this variability as it makes it hard for everyone to have the sa 'language' when communicating knowledge amongst themselves. We believe that the definition of a unit of mana is important for all future magical research as all analysis will be built upon it. And this research can be in a myriad of fields within magic, natural sciences and social sciences. Therefore, it is important to have an invariable structure so that whatever research that is built upon it doesn't collapse in the future."
Guy walked up on stage and transitioned to the next speaker, "Since the team supporting Definition 2 has one mber short, a mber who has already spoken has the opportunity to address the house again. Who will be stepping forth?"
The mbers of the second team exchanged glances before Krane reached forward and tapped Norris on her shoulder. Norris jerked in place, half-shocked and half-anxious. She pointed a finger to herself and mouthed, "?", with an expression oozing with self-doubt. Her team mbers, in turn, nodded affirmatively and started to clap for her instead. This ember burst into a burgeoning fla as the entire audience joined in to welco Norris to the podium.
The blushing girl walked with small but hurried steps to the podium. She cleared her throat, placed the crumpled paper in front of her, and started speaking. Her voice wasn't as unsure as in the previous attempt. Which Guy pegged as a sign of progress.
"While Definition 1 claims to establish a so-called 'common language' it is still reliant on the |
Firestarter| spell. The issue is that the heat transfer through that thod is inconsistent. In their report, they have employed strategies to ensure that the transfer is as efficient as possible, but that places a burden on the apparatus and environnt where the experint must be undertaken. Heat energy transfer through fire is inefficient by nature. Since it isn't directional, so energy is lost through convection and radiation from the sides. Even with the systems in place, as defined in their experintation, we believe that the mana unit definition is subject to a systematic error, making it structurally unsound as a basis for future experints. This isn't the case with the transmutation of mana to mass, as it is proven to be a lossless process. This is why Definition 2 is the most appropriate definition of the Mana Unit."
Once Norris finished speaking, she was guided back to her place amongst her team mbers amidst a round of applause. Guy then looked towards Revian, the final participant. The boy shared a look with his team mbers, who returned an encouraging smile, and the girls pumped their fists excitedly.
Revian took the podium and started the final rebuttal of the round. "While the opposing team makes a good point about the inefficient nature of heat transfer through the fire, they also rightfully emphasised the steps we took to ensure that such wastage was negated. Yet, even with the claid inefficiency, we stand behind the application of the |Firestarter| spell because it is possible to asure the loss and solve for the systematic error - the enthalpy of the chemical reaction is known, and an extension experint can be perford to obtain the systematic error. However, Definition 2 relies on mass conservation and while the opposing team claims that it is lossless, it is only a claim that remains unproven. No study delves into the exact nature in which mana is transmuted into mass. Mass in equals mass out is true if the reaction is chemical in nature. Is magical transmutation a chemical reaction? Or is the reaction happening at an atomic level? If I were to use a hundred gram mana crystal to create a diamond, and then another mana crystal to create a piece of coal, would the diamond and coal weigh the sa? While the opposing team claims that Definition 2 is robust as it is based on the law of conservation of mass, they are conveniently overlooking this glaring hole in their experint. This is why we believe that Definition 1 is the most apt descriptor of the Mana Unit."
Guy returned to the podium and waited as the applause died down. "The teams have now finished making their argunts. Before we move on to the deliberation round to determine the winner, each team will now have a minute to make a closing remark. Would the team leaders please stand?"
Kevan and Luce stood up behind their tables on cue. Kevan looked towards the judges and audience and started speaking, "In our final plea, we assert that Definition 1 isn't about suppression but about providing a standardized asure that accommodates magic's universal principles. Our approach bridges the gap between precision and creativity, fostering a common ground for discussions. By quantifying mana through a specific energy transformation, we capture its essence while maintaining coherence and comparability."
Next, Luce did the sa, "In our closing, we reiterate that magic's essence lies in its open and variable nature. Definition 2, which ties mana to water creation through the |Water Spout| spell, embraces this nature while ensuring that it is open to everyone - without having to rely on complex processes and apparatus. Furthermore, by aligning the process with a robust law of mass conservation, we ensure that any external factors that may affect the definition are avoided."
As the two mbers sat down, roaring applause and intense cheering resonated within the room. Elder Nara, in the judge's seat, turned around and revealed an intrigued smile, while Guy bore a grin that could outshine the sun.
"That went better than expected," Guy said to himself as he waited for the symphonic ruckus to die down so that he could bring the event to a close.
Word Count: 1884
Check out my Discord Server: sdiscord.gg/PKbqtembQJ
Reviews
All reviews (0)