In the following week, Zhao Yi spent his ti discussing the "Superconducting antigravity" issue with Li Ning.
At first, it was mostly Li Ning who explained the principles of "Superconducting antigravity," which seed not too complex on the surface. However, in reality, the theory involved many aspects, such as complex electromagnetic fields and ionic properties discovered during experints.
And so on.
Zhao Yi didn’t know much about these, but he began to engage in deeper discussions with Li Ning later on. He explained so issues from a microscopic perspective.
Li Ning’s approach was from a macroscopic perspective.
Their different angles on the "Superconducting antigravity" issue stemd from their work in different fields of research.
If physicists were to be categorized, the biggest division would be between theoretical and experintal physicists.
Zhao Yi was a theoretical physicist, whose research in Boundary Theory used particle mathematics to explain the microscopic world.
Li Ning, on the other hand, leaned more toward experintal physics.
In the academic pecking order, theoretical physicists stood at the apex of the pyramid while experintal physicists occupied a subordinate position. However, in reality, experintal physicists were more likely to win Nobel Prizes because experintal physics required a combination of theory and experint. Their experints were tests of theories, and the Nobel Prize valued empirical proof over the profundity of theories.
When viewing problems from different perspectives, they each made significant discoveries.
Of course, there were also controversies.
Zhao Yi directly pointed out that Li Ning’s assertion about the "self-selected new field by ionic lattices" was nonsensical from the perspective of particle mathematics.
He gave a detailed explanation.
Li Ning fervently defended his theory, believing that the constructs of particle mathematics did not align with reality and were mostly incorrect.
Then, using already proven microscopic theories, Zhao Yi provided a detailed data analysis to substantiate his argunt. Li Ning found the complex mathematical frawork challenging to comprehend but nonetheless attempted to understand it. He realized that the "new force field" argunt indeed lacked support, yet he continued to address related issues based on his own understanding.
Along with controversies and discussions, a week quickly passed.
By that ti, the discussion had almost concluded.
Zhao Yi had grasped Li Ning’s "Superconducting antigravity" theory and also expressed his own thoughts. "Professor Li, I am very interested in your theory and am eager to prove it," he said.
"However, designing experints on a whim and expecting to verify it relies heavily on luck."
"If the theory is incorrect, no matter how you design the experint, there will be no results. Therefore, my plan is to first establish a theoretical model to deduce precisely how to design the experint and what kind of experintal effects it will produce."
"Are you interested in this?"
"Of course!"
Li Ning nodded excitedly, "This is my highest achievent; I’ve always wanted to verify it, whether it’s right or wrong."
Zhao Yi assured him, "I believe it is correct."
Li Ning took it as a morale booster rather than paying it much attention, but still, he looked forward to working with Zhao Yi on perfecting the theory.
For him, this was a brand-new challenge.
As an experintal physicist, truly, Li Ning had only proven the "Superconducting antigravity" issue from a macroscopic perspective, and hadn’t approached it microscopically; his deductions were based on experints, making it impossible to explain concretely "why superconducting leads to antigravity."
Zhao Yi was internationally recognized as a top-tier mathematician and physicist who had also created the renowned "Boundary Theory."
If Zhao Yi were to assist in the theoretical research of "Superconducting antigravity," there would undoubtedly be breakthroughs on the issue.
anwhile, Li Ning was also nervous.
He wasn’t worried that Zhao Yi would fail to complete the validation work, but that his own theory might be wrong and eventually proven incorrect, rendering his life’s work aningless and turning it into a joke.
Zhao Yi understood Li Ning’s conflicting feelings, but all he could do was construct a theory combining Li Ning’s ideas with microscopic physics and mathematics, to explain why "superconducting would cause antigravity."
As for the theory being incorrect...
Zhao Yi was rely being "polite" by ntioning it. With Li Ning’s detailed explanation of the theory, he had enough to work with. Using the "Law of Cause and Effect," he effortlessly obtained results.
Naturally, they were correct—at least the results were.
The mathematical construction work for "Superconducting antigravity" aid to validate "Superconducting antigravity" and discover experintal thods to confirm the theory.
Zhao Yi set aside the "Boundary Theory" and so complex, unverifiable particle mathematics to focus on verified content. Combining this with Li Ning’s macroscopic assertions, he conducted a detailed mathematical analysis of the problem.
This might seem aningless to Zhao Yi, as if he was doing the work of an experintal physicist.
In reality, Zhao Yi found it extrely aningful because the mathematical construction of "Superconducting antigravity" narrowed the distance between particle mathematics and macroscopic physics. He could use the final mathematical frawork to connect particle mathematics issues and ultimately establish a more microscopic mathematical logic system with the Boundary Theory.
Then he could provide a more detailed explanation of "Superconducting antigravity" to find other "antigravity" thods based on theory.
This constituted a pathway.
Having made his decision, Zhao Yi joined Li Ning in patiently conducting their research, and soon they encountered a major problem--
Reviews
All reviews (0)