Font Size
15px

Chapter 1250: Chapter 403: Life imprisonnt? Death penalty!_3

However, one must understand that “strict punishnt” is not a legally defined term, making it challenging to determine its application in practice.

According to general understanding, “strict” usually implies “severe,” therefore “strict punishnt” ans severe penalty.

But, if there is no explicit legal provision, it cannot be deed a cri; without clear stipulations, no penalty can be imposed, except in cases where a harsher punishnt is explicitly defined.

This leads to two divergent views in practice: so cases argue that organized cri does not pertain to a specific criminal charge and does not affect specific sentencing, only impacting parole and sentence reduction in the future.

The legal basis is the “Criminal Law” Article 81, paragraph 2: Criminals sentenced to ten years or more for organized violent cris cannot be paroled.

Yet, other cases suggest that once categorized as organized cri, strict inherently ans severe.

The cases found reflect this clear dichotomy, resulting in the sa cases being judged differently.

Regarding this, Tang believes that both views have issues, emphasizing that each case must be analyzed specifically; organized cri should not automatically lead to severe punishnt, nor must it inherently.

The decision should be made based on the specifics of the case.

In practice, everyone understands this rationale, but applying it to specific cases requires significant effort, demanding well-crafted judgnts.

Honestly, not every judge possesses such capability.

In this particular case, Tang believes a severe penalty is warranted.

Kang Tao’s actions precisely align with another opinion released earlier this year.

Specifically, the “Opinion on Strictly Punishing Cris Committed by Organized Cri Using Minors” was newly released.

This opinion clearly identifies nine scenarios riting severe punishnt.

Kang Tao’s actions perfectly fit four of these scenarios… Out of nine severe punishnt circumstances altogether, he directly ets four criteria.

One should know that the opinion stipulates that eting any one scenario warrants severe punishnt.

Initially, it’s a jump between life imprisonnt and a suspended death sentence; now, with severity… everyone knows the situation.

So cris truly necessitate the death penalty.

As ti goes by, Kang Baicheng and his wife grow anxious again, mainly because there’s no progress on the other side of reconciliation.

“Mr. Min, what’s the situation? Still haven’t reached an agreent? Seriously, at this point in ti…”

Min Weidong continues to try and persuade, but it’s futile since there’s no progress on his end despite prolonged negotiations.

Tang Fangjing… is toxic!

So, Kang Baicheng and his wife seek out Yan Xiaoli once again, what can you lawyers do, warn us that we can’t reach out?

Their son faces a life sentence, how can you expect them to stay calm at this ti!

Yan Xiaoli naturally follows Tang’s instructions, collecting everything necessary.

After another morning, Tang receives a call; it’s already been three tis.

“Zhang Wei, go back for now. It’s unlikely to be provocation; just handle it as illegal trespassing, that should be fine, right?”

On the other end, Zhang Wei laughs happily, “No problem, Director.”

Watching Zhang Wei leave, Tang sighs; he doesn’t want to send soone in, but there’s no choice when they’re coming at you. What can he do?

Why is there still no movent from Lao Han’s side? Can’t manage such a trivial matter and still plans to treat for a al?

Just as he ponders, news arrives from the Procuratorate: after nurous etings and discussions, a decision has finally been made.

The sentencing recomndation for Kang Tao is: imdiate execution of the death penalty!

Min Weidong is stunned; how could it be the death penalty!

Admittedly, there have been cases where a nineteen-year-old was sentenced to death for murder, but this case hasn’t beco widely known, leaving the social impact less considered.

He had indeed considered the possibility of a death sentence before, given the appalling circumstances of inciting murder, and the person instigated being of that age.

Also **, the victim was of that age…

Each and every aspect is extrely heinous.

But… the possibility of a death penalty seed slim at first, what happened this ti!

He doesn’t even know how to explain it to Kang Baicheng.

As for Kang Tao himself, upon learning the Prosecutorate’s sentencing recomndation, he fainted on the spot.

What, wasn’t it supposed to possibly be life imprisonnt? How did it suddenly turn into a death penalty?

Once conscious, he began crying continuously, a life sentence was one thing, but now the death penalty truly terrifies him.

Though it’s just a sentencing recomndation for now, the ntion of the death penalty invokes fear in anyone.

What to do, mom and dad, why haven’t you saved yet!

You are reading What's wrong with this lawyer?! Chapter 1250: 403: Life imprisonment? Death penalty!3 on novel69. Use the chapter navigation above or below to continue reading the latest translated chapters.
Share with your friends
Library saves books to your account. Reading History saves recent chapters in this browser.
Continuous reading

You may also like

No reviews yet. Be the first reader to leave one.
Please create an account or sign in to post a comment.