In the era of the internet, engaging in verbal confrontations is truly a matter of technical expertise from all aspects.
Netizens of this age have truly seen a lot and know a lot.
How to cause the most damage to the opponent without crossing the line really tests one's ability to pinpoint weaknesses and hit where it hurts.
Happily, Dou Dou's fans are really good at this.
Even if they weren't initially skilled, after battling their wits with Dou Dou for so long, they've more or less learned this set of skills.
After a year, Dou Dou's fans have been refined countless tis.
Those whose intelligence and awareness couldn't keep up with the pace have long beco passersby and gone their separate ways.
Even Dou Dou's haters may have extre views, but their intelligence is definitely on point.
So what's the sore spot?
It's naturally the credibility of the Nobel Prize.
More specifically, whether the old international science award review rules are fair and whether they are adaptive to the tis!
As for how to break it?
That would be to find the mistakes!
Or rather, to dig up old issues.
To say that a century-old science award has been completely error-free – void of regrets and mistakes – is naturally impossible.
Just as the articles from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences say, as long as one is human, mistakes are inevitable. One of the most valuable human spirits is whether one can frankly accept mistakes and ensure that the error-correction chanism can operate smoothly.
But online argunts don't care about all that.
A mistake is a mistake. Since you're willing to accept errors, then you have to listen honestly to all kinds of skepticism.
The cunning aspect of Dou Dou's fans lies in the fact that when they go to other people's turf to post Dou Dou's responses, they never ntion this year's Crafoord Prize.
For example, when posting in German, fans will talk at length about the famous German scientist Arnold Somrfeld.
This big shot was also one of the pioneers of quantum physics, made important contributions to the theory of atomic structure, but why is it his students could win awards, and he could not? Was it because he offended the Swedes back then?
Underneath French posts, they would shout loudly to give Henry Becquerel his due recognition!
Others like Nikola Tesla, Lize itner...
Even Einstein almost failed to receive one; dare we say there's no trickery involved.
As for the Russian-speaking region, there's even more to talk about.
How formidable was the old Big Brother back then, matching up against the West for so many years. Aside from literary and social science awards, they only managed to obtain just over 20 Nobel Prizes in the field of natural sciences. We don't believe that fairly reflected the contributions of scientists to human civilization at that ti – do you?
So why should we still use an old, unfair, and secretive evaluation thod?!
Clearly, Dou Dou's thinking is precise, stirring up the new generation's rebellion against authoritative judgnt.
After analyzing Dou Dou's algorithm principle, to describe it in words would be, before one becos an authority, one of the most fulfilling things is successfully questioning authority. All it did was provide everyone with such an opportunity, as well as becoming the backing for these new generations.
Yes, Dou Dou never intended to change the minds of the old academics.
It's enough as long as young people think that the Artificial Intelligence selection thod is good.
The academic community is about inheritance, and the bigger the na of the professor, usually the more students they have.
As long as it has planted the seeds and they can take root and gather a group of young supporters, the bigwigs of the academic community will have to consider the thoughts of the younger generation sowhat.
Not to ntion that Dou Dou has made significant sacrifices this ti, historically "weeping" about being wronged on Weibo...
Keep in mind that Dou Dou was never one to give in.
But giving in has had great effects.
At least in a very short ti, the whole world was amazed that Artificial Intelligence could also feel wronged, while everyone learned that Huaxia Xilin officially established the Qiaoze Natural Science Award, with a slightly higher prize money than the Nobel Prize, and that it was predominantly led by Artificial Intelligence throughout most of the selection process.
Incidentally, it also shed light on so inside information, causing many people to have a smidgeon of doubt about the credibility of the Nobel Prize.
Killing many birds with one stone...
As for what kind of backlash this move would cause, it was not of Dou Dou's concern.
As long as the purpose of promoting the Qiaoze Natural Science Award and the new evaluation rules has been achieved, that's enough. The next task is to attract as many heavyweight candidates as possible into the website's review system.
The first Qiaoze Natural Award is the hardest.
With so many people watching, it must include so weighty figures to display the prestige of the award.
Although in terms of mathematics and physics, no one has made greater contributions than Qiao Ze in recent years.
But since this award is organized by his own people, Qiao Ze will certainly not participate in the selection.
His contribution score is displayed on the candidate website, with the very simple purpose of advertising for the award.
There will always be those who want to see the gap in contribution scores between them and Qiao Ze.
In this aspect, Dou Dou very cunningly used a stepwise logarithmic algorithm in the contribution scoring formula.
To put it simply, three thousand points is one level, five thousand is another level, and ten thousand points is the stuff of legend. It's easy to score higher in the lower bands, but each leap in contribution level represents a completely different challenge.
Just like the Richter Magnitude Scale, the difference between a magnitude 7 earthquake and a magnitude 8 is just one level, but the energy difference is about 32 tis more. If comparing a magnitude 7 to a magnitude 9, the energy released differs by about 1000 tis.
Reviews
All reviews (0)