Lu Xuan’s explanation of kidney cancer had a profound impact on both Su Kenan and Ji Xiuwen.
Is cancer an incurable disease?
Why can’t Western dicine cure cancer?
Actually, cancer is not an incurable disease, at least not in traditional Chinese dicine.
Cancer is just a specific term invented by Western dicine for a certain type of condition.
For example: brain cancer, leukemia, tongue cancer, throat cancer, esophageal cancer, etc.
Just looking at these nas is frightening enough, making Western dicine appear very "profound and scientific," as if it knows everything.
However, when it cos to specific "treatnt thods," the "simple-minded characteristic" of Western dicine becos glaringly obvious. With so many strange types of cancer, it basically resorts to the "three moves of Cheng Yaojin":
Traditional cold weapons, surgery, using a scalpel to remove cancerous tissue;
Chemical weapons, chemotherapy, using chemical drugs to kill cancerous tissue;
Biochemical weapons, radiation therapy, attempting to kill cancer cells with radiation.
After the three moves, if the treatnt is unsuccessful and the patient dies, for Western dicine, this is an "incurable disease"; if the patient’s life is spared, surviving the three trials, and the post-treatnt examination shows the cancer mass has shrunk or temporarily "disappeared," they proclaim the "treatnt was very successful."
As for when it grows back, in the eyes of Western dicine, this is a "relapse"; if it appears elsewhere, it’s a "tastasis."
To put it extrely, it’s an unwillingness to admit they can’t cure it, so whatever the final result, it is always considered a "success" in Western dicine.
If sothing goes wrong, it’s always the patient’s bad luck and unrelated to the treatnt.
As to why cancer "relapses" or "tastasizes," Western dicine doesn’t know and doesn’t care.
However, it must be said that behind almost every type of cancer, there are huge dical costs, especially for malignant tumors, often leading to patients becoming impoverished, losing both their wealth and their lives.
The money is gone, the person is not saved, and they may even die suffering during treatnt.
Ji Xiuwen has no particular research on cancer and has only recently encountered a few cases; previously, he only had so understanding of cancers related to the digestive system through so cases Lu Xuan had seen before.
However, he’s seen many comnts on cancer online.
Especially when it cos to the viewpoints and treatnts of cancer in Western and Chinese dicine, the conflict between the two is irreconcilable.
Those who believe in traditional Chinese dicine naturally detest the three moves of Western dicine.
Those who have faith in Western dicine think traditional Chinese dicine is unscientific, even within the realm of taphysics, as many things aren’t explained clearly—how can it be used to treat disease and save people?
However, it should be ntioned that the Western countries that advocate Western dicine as the savior are increasingly emphasizing traditional Chinese dicine in recent years.
Countries like Japan and South Korea are rushing to register Chinese dicine as their own, turning the millennia-old tradition into sothing that belongs to them.
The United States even established special funds to develop Chinese dicine, spending large sums to bring skilled Chinese dicine practitioners to their country.
On one hand, they treat Chinese dicine as a treasure, while on the other, they constantly belittle it.
If Chinese dicine were truly worthless, would these countries at the forefront of Western dicine pay such attention to it?
This in itself is a false premise.
It is worth pondering the reasons behind this.
Moreover, Ji Xiuwen also saw so interesting statents online, ntioning a foolish but potentially better thod than various Western dical treatnts for malignant tumors, which is "no treatnt."
Because not treating is rely "waiting to die," while treating is definitely "seeking death."
And the survival rate and ti when "waiting to die" might be higher and longer than "seeking death."
If judged by the "average survival ti after surgery" in Western dicine to evaluate efficacy, "no treatnt" produces better "results" than Western cancer treatnt thods.
There were even nurous statistics listed; it has to be said, it seems like a joke, but after hearing Lu Xuan’s words today, he gained a new understanding of this joke.
However, Ji Xiuwen knows this isn’t just a joke. Foreign dical researchers have confird through thousands of cases that patients who were determined not to go to the hospital for Western dicine’s three moves and simply awaited death generally lived longer than those rushing to "combat cancer fully."
In 1986, British doctor Hulse Jede discovered that surgical removal can instead cause cancer cells to spread rapidly.
Surgically removing human tissue inevitably brings destruction to bodily tissue and the transfer of cancer cells. According to Chinese dicine theory, random surgical removal will surely destroy the body’s biological system, leading to even greater chaos in life systems, only making things worse!
It’s like a complete ecosystem suddenly missing a part, affecting the entire chain.
Moreover, Western dical approaches to cancer not only involve removing the cancer mass but also cutting out other healthy tissue surrounding it to prevent the spread of cancer cells.
This is what’s still practiced broadly: the treatnt thod which eliminates both good and bad together—the "large-scale removal thod of cancer mass alongside normal surrounding tissue."
And this procedure has a very elegant na, "tumor-free excision thod."
Thinking of these things, after Yu Xiaowan helped Yu Yunxing out of the consultation room, Ji Xiuwen looked at Lu Xuan and said, "Do you rember the report we saw in school about the Arican Cancer Institute in 1977 regarding the surgical treatnt of a woman with breast cancer?"
Reviews
All reviews (0)