"Editors of top-tier journals are struggling to have him publish his work, and there’s even talk of the highest possible paynts for it?"
"This is ’Acta Mathematica’, this is ’Nature’ magazine!"
What is the reputation of ’Acta Mathematica’?
What is the reputation of ’Nature’?
Such world-class magazines, anyone who has published even a single article on them is eligible to beco a professor at a major university dostically, and it also becos a lifelong bragging capital for many people.
And the result?
Two top-tier journals invite Zhao Yi to publish, which sparked a heated argunt, and Zhao Yi’s expression...seems a bit reluctant?
——!!
...
The academic seminar is over.
The proof of the ’Supersymtry Problem’ was already published, but unexpectedly, Zhao Yi had established the connection between energy structure and mass during the seminar.
This news caused a stir in the international physics community.
As the dia reported more and more information and many top scholars at the seminar began to speak out, the international physics community suddenly woke to the impact of what had happened. Many mathematicians and physicists looked at the reports to learn about the detailed news, and subsequently made the sa judgnt as Qiu Chengwen--
The Boundaries of Particles Theory’s research prospects have surpassed String Theory.
There’s a saying in the international theoretical physics community that ’String Theory is dead.’ This doesn’t an that String Theory is incorrect, but rather that it’s very difficult for String Theory research to yield results.
After the second revolution of the String Theory, it attracted many top-tier scholars and enthusiastic young talents. However, there have been no noteworthy achievents in the past several years.
Although there are still many top scholars studying String Theory, the international community doesn’t have much optimism about the future prospects of String Theory research.
The Boundaries of Particles Theory has just erged, yet it has resolved the Supersymtry Problem and established the connection between energy and mass. The subsequent study will certainly involve gravity and electromagnetic force, and the research prospects are very broad.
Many mathematicians and physicists are already preparing to apply for programs related to the Boundaries of Particles Theory.
This is what ’following the trend’ is all about.
Actually, most top scholars are not as great as one might think. They lack the dedication to devote themselves entirely to scientific research, and just like ordinary people, they hope to achieve results and personal glory, realize financial freedom, earn more money, and lead a better life.
Research in pure mathematics and theoretical physics is very difficult to yield significant results.
A majority of scholars will never produce noteworthy work in their lifetis. Achievents require not only talent and efforts but also a great deal of luck. Picking the right area of study can lead to significant discoveries. However, if one’s research direction is misplaced, then no matter how talented they are or how hard they work, they are simply wasting their ti.
That’s why many top scholars simply ’milk the system’, applying for research programs and outlining great prospects to secure funding, disregarding whether they will yield results later.
The ergence of the Boundaries of Particles Theory, which will clearly beco a hot topic in the future, makes it easy to obtain funding for research programs.
At the sa ti, the prospects of the Boundaries of Particles Theory are indeed very promising.
The Boundaries of Particles Theory has just erged, and already it has produced results comparable to those of String Theory. It still has nurous areas and topics for future research, and it might genuinely produce so new discoveries.
This is just too enticing!
Within a week after Zhao Yi’s academic seminar, hundreds of academic research projects related to the Boundaries of Particles Theory appeared around the world.
As a result, the international physics community was flooded with discussions about the ’Boundaries of Particles Theory’.
Reviews
All reviews (0)