Ten days?
In other words, it took Qiu Chengwen six or seven hours of research to get a general idea of the paper, not even going into a detailed argunt.
What about Zhang Hongzhi?
Three days!
"Zhang Hongzhi’s level is impressive, he finished the review in just three days! He’s several tis faster than Master Qiu!"
"No wonder he’s the leader of the physics departnt!"
"Amazing, amazing!"
The people in the editorial office speculated about the specific situation.
Qiu Chengwen isn’t as old as Yang Zhenning. He is only about sixty, and his mind is sharp and his energy is good. He has won the Fields dal and made so achievents in physics, so his level is definitely world-class.
So, Zhang Hongzhi probably didn’t even look at the manuscript carefully and just wrote a comnt right away.
Of course.
This kind of thing can’t be said directly. They invited Zhang Hongzhi to participate in the review, and he responded. When the ti cos, they just need to record his comnts.
Two more days passed.
Finally, the editorial office received a review response from Yang Zhenning, who clearly said, "I didn’t finish it, but the part I read is fine."
"Only Zhao Yi could solve the Supersymtry problem based on the particle energy theory, but the content is indeed fascinating."
"A perfect mathematical frawork, a perfect theoretical logic."
"I dare say that many people will soon be interested in the particle boundary theory."
"This paper on supersymtry can be called ’the first revolution of particle boundary theory!’"
Yang Zhenning’s "first revolution" refers to the revolution of string theory.
In the early 1980s, string theory was initially not well-received. Edward Witten expanded string theory and created "superstring theory" with perfect mathematical proof and analysis, which unified quantum chanics and the General Theory of Relativity, attracting many mathematicians and physicists.
This was the first revolution of string theory.
The developnt of a theoretical physics discipline requires a basic theory to verify or accommodate content that cannot be proven temporarily.
"Superstring theory" unifies quantum chanics and the General Theory of Relativity, so it naturally attracts attention from many people.
Previously, the particle boundary theory was only considered to have the potential of "establishing a new school" with the way of boundary energy construction, explaining the "irregularity" of particles, the reason for the disappearance of particles, and the issue of "absolute zero being unattainable".
Although it contains classic mathematical logic and solves so problems, it can actually be attributed to the idea that "particles must keep moving." It is because particles need to keep moving that achieving absolute zero is impossible, and stopping movent will lead to their dissipation.
Now that supersymtry has been proven with particle boundary theory, it will undoubtedly gain more recognition and lead to curiosity in the academic world: "Can particle boundary theory be used to answer more questions, or even achieve a grand unification of chanics?"
When more mathematicians and physicists participate in the research of particle boundary theory, it can be called a completed revolution, and the "particle boundary theory school" will erge unconsciously.
...
Zhao Yi didn’t think that deeply. He received a ssage from the "Mathematical Physics Journal" editorial office saying that both the Chinese and English versions of the magazine’s next issue would publish his submitted paper.
This was expected.
With his reputation and influence, as long as there are no direct errors in the paper, even if it has little significance when published, it will undoubtedly pass the editorial review and be published in the next issue of the magazine.
As for the impact of the publication...
As a matter of fact, he hadn’t thought about it at all because the content of the study was theoretical physics. To put it bluntly, the particle boundary theory cannot be proven temporarily since particles in reality cannot be split, and so particles even require detailed data analysis to determine their existence.
The particle boundary theory cannot be proven, and the analysis and research based on it are naturally just a theory.
This paper on supersymtry analysis is just a small part of the collaboration with Edward Witten on the multi-dinsional boundary space issue.
After completing the theoretical elaboration of supersymtry, the content concerning particle energy will be almost completed. Then, combining it with the constructed mathematical system, the next step will be to study the logic of particles being given mass and derive the multi-dinsional space boundary, which is the Higgs chanism’s logic.
The latter still requires supplentary research from Edward Witten.
Zhao Yi is also looking forward to it.
Although the content being researched is "unprovable," a deep analysis using mathematical thods might eventually bring about the unification of the four forces. Even if only a part of the theory is researched in depth, as long as the content is deep enough, it can derive so reality-proven things. Maybe one day in the future, his theory can be verified.
By then...
Could he compare to Einstein? Or perhaps he would beco even more famous?
Zhao Yi quickly gave up on his fantasy and shook his head in distress. He spent so much energy on physics research, but the main content was theoretical physics. Unprovable theories will not be accepted by the Nobel committee.
In other words...
No matter how deep the research on particle physics goes, even if he completes the study of multi-dinsional space boundaries and forms a complete, closed-loop theory, it will never win the Nobel Prize in Physics because it cannot be proven.
But, the system had issued a mainline task for the Nobel Prize in Physics. How should he solve this problem?
Reviews
All reviews (0)