This proves the correctness of genetics.
So in reality, Qingzi must not be Akagi Gangken’s real sister, at least not from the sa father and mother.
If they are from the sa mother but different fathers...
It is said the unfaithfulness rate of RB’s won is consistently high; perhaps there is so connection!?
...
The conjectural paper on the ’chanism of myocarditis’ and the effect of its experintal validation are still fernting continuously.
When the Biodical Research Institute first announced a simple experint to validate the conjecture process and assert its correctness, the influence was not very significant. For dical chanism research, simple experints can’t explain much.
In the following days, the Institute constantly released news about successful verifications. The successful verifications were not a big sensation, as multiple experints don’t necessarily an much. In the field of dical research, in order to validate the entire process, we need to design a large ’group of experints’, which can take a long ti. Most of the important tests can only be designed after the virus has completely disappeared from the myocardium of mice.
So in a short span of ti, the conclusions from the experints are not very significant.
But there is one point that is overshadowing. With the conclusions from the completed experints, none of them has been proven wrong.
This is truly astonishing!
According to normal logic, there must be sothing wrong sowhere in the ’chanism of myocarditis conjecture’ process, even if it is based on the logic of disease chanisms, and making reasonable assessnts. Wherever there are inaccuracies, the initial experints should have exposed mistakes.
But the results...
Not a single mistake?
Is the Biodical Research Institute releasing false news, or is there really nothing wrong with the experintal verification?
This has even sparked discussion in the field of dical research.
Other dical research agencies, which had originally been observers, have begun to show interest in the contents of the paper after seeing the news released by the Biodical Research Institute, and have also started designing experints for verification.
They don’t have any direct relation with Zhao Yi and conducting the verification will confer no benefit to them. They definitely won’t invest a lot of resources, but laboratories with similar research can rely on existing resources to design so experints.
A week has passed.
So organizations that conducted the verification have stepped forward and publicly announced their experintal verification results, which almost unanimously support the hypothesis about the chanism of myocarditis.
At this point, so dical research institutions started issuing comnts saying, "Perhaps Zhao Yi’s chanism conjecture is all correct."
"That is really terrifying!"
"Impossible!"
"But so far, all the conclusions support his point of view, which also implies that most of the subsequent experints will support it. We cannot be sure it is completely correct, but we can be sure that most of it is correct."
This conclusion seems unbelievable.
Just like Dai Tianqing and Han Hui’s initial feelings, it’s hard for dical researchers to believe that through thinking and ’rationally designed inference’, the mystery surrounding the highly difficult chanism project can be uncovered, while most of their work just improves the project little by little. Most of the ti there isn’t even any progress.
Now, soone’s thought-based conjecture has finished the significantly aningful ’chanism of myocarditis’ project?
It’s hard to accept...
As many dical researchers were doubting themselves, veteran academician Zheng Yingru took a stand. She openly accepted an interview with reporters, discussed the issue of experintal verification, and also talked about dical research.
"Many people in the field of dical research often have a feeling that dical research, especially in the field of pathological chanisms, relies heavily on luck. Maybe you discover sothing suddenly, and the research will progress. If you are not lucky and do not discover anything for a long ti, there won’t be any progress."
"This is not right!"
"In my view, dical research is no different from other fields. It depends not on hard work or luck, but on solid foundations, seriousness in work, and talent. You can’t do without any of these."
"From the point of view of normal pathological chanism research, a ’dical chanism conjecture’ is like a child who doesn’t even know how to walk yet suddenly knows how to run. It doesn’t make sense to rely on the brain to perfect the chanism process, instead of making conclusions step by step through experints."
"However, we cannot deny that there are so geniuses in the world who can perhaps run imdiately or even fly."
"We can discern from the conjectural paper that it is not a fabrication of imagination, but is supported by observed experints."
"It’s like running on the road with only a few roadblocks. Most people will lose direction, but so people can determine if they are on the right road based on the position and direction of the roadblocks."
"It’s very clear from the analogy just now: so people can’t draw clear conclusions from obvious experintal results, while so people can co up with reasonable ideas from simple experints. If you summarize these reasonable ideas, you might be able to form a complete set of pathological inferences."
"Therefore, I believe that in dical research, especially on the study of pathological chanisms, talent is also very important."
Zheng Yingru’s aning is essentially that most people conducting dical research are ordinary people, without any dical research talent. They rely on nurous experints to make progress in their research and experintal projects.
Reviews
All reviews (0)