Several research institutions and dical professors also ca to the sa conclusion.
Now, no one dares to say that all of Zhao Yi’s conjectures are correct; they can only say that "the experint did not find any errors." Whether they are correct and how many are correct still need a large number of experints to verify.
This is already enough.
The release of the new information imdiately affected the direction of public opinion.
Zhao Yi’s paper is indeed a very incomprehensible ’pathological chanism conjecture’, and all the conjectures are wrong, which can be described as ’nonsense’; is there a part that is correct?
If so, the conjecture would be very aningful!
Using experints to verify the conclusion is much easier than doing research. As long as a part of it is proven to be correct, Zhao Yi can be said to have made significant contributions to the research of the ’pathogenic chanism of viral myocarditis’.
Tian Zhenke, an expert from Capital dical University, ca forward and explained the "significance of simple experintal results." "When simple experints cannot prove errors, it ans that the general direction is correct. And if the general direction is correct, it ans that a large part of it is correct."
"This is very aningful, and it will lead to breakthroughs in the study of abnormal immune reactions to the heart!"
"Just looking at the results we have now, we can say that Zhao Yi’s paper is very valuable!"
"It must not be a random guess, but a reasonable inference and analysis based on observed facts."
"In fact, this is very common in dical experints."
Tian Zhenke said seriously, "So dical experints can’t identify what problem the results reflect, so researchers will conduct a possibility analysis and then verify it with experints."
"Zhao Yi’s conjecture paper is a complete set of possibility analyses. It sounds incredible, but considering his mathematical skills, we should think this way: he applied his research in mathematics to dical research."
"This is very interesting."
Tian Zhenke jokingly said, "However, I am sure I can’t learn it."
Subsequently, a reporter asked Deng Shufang, and he said sothing interesting, "I think he could comnt on Zhao Yi’s Collatz Conjecture paper in the sa way. Maybe ’Mathematics Society Magazine’ would like this kind of humor?"
Of course, it was a joke.
One of the top four mathematics journals, the ’Mathematics Society Magazine’ would not pay attention to Deng Shufang.
Tian Zhenke ant that Zhao Yi’s chanism conjecture paper was of great significance, but it was criticized by a professor from his own school for no reason, which was quite ridiculous.
Tian Zhenke is not an important figure, but his interview attracted a lot of discussion.
Public opinion finally reacted.
Those who didn’t know how to react suddenly felt deceived by Deng Shufang. At first, they thought Zhao Yi wrote a ’nonsense’ paper, but later they found the paper interesting and aningful. However, the valuable paper was criticized by their own school’s professor, Deng Shufang, who directly guided the developnt of public opinion.
Deng Shufang...
What kind of a scumbag is he?
Public opinion is very powerful, and the internet has strengthened this power. Soon, Deng Shufang’s resu was dug out.
Ph.D. in dicine.
Forty years old, rated as a professor.
Gave up dical research work later and applied for administrative duties. One of the editors of the "Journal of Life Sciences Institute."
"What? Deng Shufang doesn’t do dical research?"
"What? Deng Shufang does administrative work?"
"What? He is also one of the editors of the magazine. In other words, has the authority to decide what the magazine publishes?"
This is pure deceit!
Imdiately, voices questioning and even cursing Deng Shufang appeared on the public opinion.
The officials also stepped in.
Public opinion was all focused on Yanhua University. Whether it was Deng Shufang or the Biodical Research Institute, Zhao Yi was also a Yanhua University freshman and served as a specially-appointed researcher at the Laboratory of Intelligence and Automation. There was no way to separate them from Yanhua University.
Yanhua University imdiately reacted, announcing the withdrawal of Deng Shufang’s administrative position and editorial duties in the "Journal of Life Sciences Institute," and carrying out internal sanctions while continuing to investigate the incident.
In fact, the investigation is just an external statent; the school will certainly study how to deal with Deng Shufang internally.
The specific results will not generally be made public.
It’s not that they want to give Deng Shufang a break, but in order not to cause follow-up public opinions. Because punishnt can easily cause controversy, whether it’s too heavy or too light, it will have an impact. Even if it’s not light or heavy, it can cause controversy because everyone has different judgnt criteria.
It’s best to suppress public opinion.
...
At this mont.
Deng Shufang was really confused. He didn’t understand why public opinion changed so quickly, and why there were so many voices criticizing him everywhere. Many people even directly cursed at him.
The reporters who had lined up to interview him before had disappeared, and the people who had invited him to participate in the program were gone, and he was also punished by the school.
The school basically told him in one sentence, "Go ho and wait for the results!"
Of course.
Deng Shufang also understood that the reason was Zhao Yi’s conjecture paper, much of which had been verified to be correct, which he couldn’t accept.
How is it possible?
A freshman who hasn’t even entered school yet, even if he’s a genius in mathematics and computer science, has nothing to do with dical research!
Reviews
All reviews (0)