To understand the scientific principles behind particle and macromolecule transmission in the experint, one needs enough information to help perfect the theory, and then deduce the principles of the experint.
Regrettably, they do not yet have enough information.
Many pieces of information are on the Mars-1 spaceship.
The explosion on the spaceship left a lot of powder, which is an important piece of information, as it allows for the study of the proportions of particles and molecules, as well as the intensity of the explosion, thus conjecturing many things.
It is simply impossible for the Mars-1 spaceship to return to Earth in a short ti. The experintal plan schedules the spaceship’s return to Earth at about ten months.
This is already the fastest speed.
Even if it takes ten months, almost 300 days, to return to Earth, it is still quite astonishing. Humanity is not exploring Jupiter for the first ti; in the past, probes were sent to observe Jupiter, so passing by at a distance, others entering Jupiter’s orbit for observation.
Even just passing by Jupiter at a distance took more than six hundred days, and entering Jupiter’s orbit required much higher technical difficulty; only one probe has accomplished this task, taking over two thousand days in total.
To date, no probe has been able to return from Jupiter, but given the distance from Jupiter to Mars and the technical difficulties involved, a re ten months is unimaginable.
The ten-month return of Mars-1 to Earth was made possible by Unlimited Solar Energy Transmission Power Technology.
This technology could provide the Mars-1 with a continuous supply of power. The spaceship’s onboard thrusters did not perform well, only providing slow acceleration, but given enough ti, they could still bring the spaceship to a fairly amazing speed, shortening the return journey from Jupiter to Earth.
But no matter how you put it, it will certainly not be possible to study the explosion on the Mars-1 in a short ti; the only available information is from the detection at the ground-based enclosed connection terminal, i.e., the detection of the remaining materials after transmission.
Whether it is tallic substances or other materials, initial detection indicated a loss of more than half. The stable luminosity imdiately yielded detection results: the instantaneous energy transfer efficiency exceeded ninety-one percent.
Soon.
Detailed results of the detection were available.
All the materials in the enclosed space, including the air, had a mass loss of around fifty-two point three seven percent.
The theoretical group considered this data to be unimportant.
Zhao Yi concluded, "Right now, we have two results. One is that energy transfer efficiency has greatly increased, which ans that the research direction of the Voidon hypothesis is correct."
Instead of confirming the existence of Voidons, saying that the research direction of the Voidon hypothesis is correct implies that a single instance in ti cannot prove the existence of Voidons.
The Voidon hypothesis is still a hypothesis to this date; it’s just that the research direction and experintal results based on the hypothetical existence of Voidons are not in conflict.
This direction can be researched continuously until an experint proves the existence or non-existence of Voidons.
Zhao Yi continued, "The mass loss in the enclosed space signifies the montary transmission of particles and macromolecules. The particles and macromolecules were divided and compressed into the voidless area within the spaceship."
"But I think the significance of the mass loss figure isn’t great because an explosion occurred midway through the experint, damaging the transmission equipnt in the ship, preventing the completion of the experint."
"But one thing I can be certain of is that macromolecule transmission occurred during the experint."
The others nodded in agreent.
The reasoning is simple: if the mass loss were all due to particle transmission, the nuclear fusion reaction that occurred at the other end on the spaceship would not have been so minor.
If such a large mass were converted entirely into single particles, the nuclear fusion reaction that would erupt on the other side would be astounding. Even if the lting point of the tal materials at the base of the platform is above ten thousand degrees Celsius, it would certainly be lted instantly, and then the entire spaceship would be engulfed.
The fact that the main equipnt of the Mars-1 has not malfunctioned and is still on its way back to Earth indicates that the intensity of the explosion was very small, which ans that many atoms and macromolecules have been transmitted.
These macromolecules and atoms have not undergone particle cleavage, and naturally, would not participate in the nuclear reaction.
"But the current question is, why did particle, atom, and macromolecule transmission occur?"
Zhao Yi raised a question.
The theoretical group then started to research this issue. The simplest and most direct thod was to compare the two experints since a nuclear fusion explosion occurred in both events.
In the first experint, transmission occurred within a compressed space on one end and a vacuum environnt on the other, which led to a small-scale nuclear explosion. But the end-terminal’s mass loss was tiny, indicating that the majority of the occurrences were particle transmissions.
This ti, the interruption happened in a closed ordinary space, and the other end was an area where space did not exist. As a result, particle, atom, and macromolecule transmissions occurred, along with a certain level of explosion.
The second transmission involved more material, but the explosion was comparatively smaller, indicating that most of the transmission involved atoms and macromolecules.
After several days of study, everyone had their own view on the experint. Edward Witten believed that ’there exists a higher-dinsional space that acts as a transfer station for energy and material transfers’, "which is why particles must be energized to allow for transmission."
Reviews
All reviews (0)